Category talk:Kusoge

Should this category exist?

This category is based on statements of subjective judgement and may not be right for a wiki such as this. For example, Spelunker is a game currently on this list that has had a massive resurgence due to its quality despite some people considering it Kusoge. There is no way to accurately categorize games as kusoge that all parties will agree on. Syncoplay (talk) 03:53, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

The intent for this category is to mark software that is universally and unquestionably known and remembered for the lack of any quality control. While it can be up for debate for certain software that debatably isn't good but can be enjoyed by some, this is meant for software that more or less is remembered for how bottom of the barrel you can get. While there is an element of subjectiveness to this category it comes from the overall and universal reception rather than pointing a finger at software that doesn't quite meet the criteria for Kusoge. --Bro3256 (talk) 04:04, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

But is the category useful? wouldn't it be better to just make a page for Games Notable for their Low Quality? I think that would work a lot better than a category like this. --Randomcat2000 (talk) 04:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

I'm not against the idea for a page like that. If anything it would be a lot more clear as to why it's labeled as such rather than having this category. --Bro3256 (talk) 04:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)